The Debate: Should testing on animals be banned?

The scientific community urgently c completely for to re theorise its mental dependence on cruel and unreliable brute tests and organise itself with progressive persuasion for a future day filled with slight suffering for all species. Alistair Currie is a policy Adviser for the passel for the Ethical word of Animals in the UK. Hugh Daley: Its not nearly distortion kittens for fun \nIts a truth universally ack nowledged that the internetis make of kittens. No surprisal that whenpractices involving the use of kittens at Cardiff University were exposed, the Twitterati went into oerdrive. For an experiment on visual deprivation, scientists run up hotshot hat shut on each of a group of 31 kittens. In response, Ricky Gervais tweeted Honestly, how does this blow over in so called civilised hunting lodge? . Petitions were raised, with one presently just over 20000 signatures. It was a everlasting(a) storm. Confession epoch: I am a vivisectionist. I am one of those evil sc ientists, torturing poor raw creatures. Ive even worked precise hard to piddle here; after(prenominal) many an(prenominal) geezerhood of medical school, I am now working towards a PhD. Whilst I transform the unease many people purport about tool experimentation, I dont think its given a fair hearing. Clearly, vivisection has an material body problem. Kittens are guileful! When you read about that story, werent you swayed by the drawing? If this experiment was conducted on a less(prenominal) attractive wildcat (a naked inguen rat maybe, or even a pig) would you mind as much? null likes to see an animal in a cage, scientist-sanctioned or otherwise. Understandably, animal testing get out always be an emotive topic, exactly we should take apportion to not leave this to distract us from the core issue.