In a Grove :: essays research papers

Louis Andrei Zabala                                             Litera210335625                                               07/11/05In A GroveIt is a story that provides the ultimate explanation of how two incompatible people who are witnesses to a crime give completely dissimilar psychological recollections of the same event. The author reminds us that uprightness depends on the coition. individual must step forward and tell that true statement.I believe that no matter how many times you read "In A Grove," theres not enough information in the story to figure out the uprightness somewhat what took place on the d ay of the samurais death, but its still playing period to sort out what you think you know for sure, what seems highly probable, what seems highly improbable, and what doesnt accommodate into any of these three categories. But for me, "In A Grove" isnt about searching for some kind of absolute truth its about how different than people perceive the same external event. The best example in the story of what I mean by this is perhaps the sword competitiveness between the bandit and the samurai. The bandit perceived it as a dire duel between a pair of honorable, expert swordsmen while the woodsman saw two scared, clumsy men stumbling around with swords in their hands as each tried desperately to prevail over the other any way he could. When its all said and done, you wont know who is telling the truth, who is lying and, most importantly, why.Yet the parable is more important, today, perhaps, as a lesson in how we construct the narratives upon which justice depends What f acts must we know to decide the truth? That question makes the authors inquiry the concern of those who now try out justice in the GMA presidency, as well.And it doesnt matter one bit. The writer isnt raise in truth, lies or anything of the sort. Hes interested in reality, and the reality of human truth is that no one will ever really know it.