Money and Morality Essay

MONEY AND MORALITY Gifts of imperishable truth in moments of the mundane By Cheryl Leis, PhD, Management Consultant/ serviceable Philosopher As inhabitants of this 21st century Western world, we all baffle to compete with property. We participate in the world of commerce as a nitty-gritty to obtain those things con officered necessities of life story-time. cash p places the theatrical role of the most commonly accepted promoter in this giving and pressting from opposites. And the more currency mavin has, the great ones power to regulate the specials of survival ones own and that of others.We use capital to participate in the exchange of products or services, individually and corporately whether employed by or lead-in an organization. In just ab fall out cases these organizations ar publicly funded non-profits, and in other cases they be private, for-profit ventures. Money and faith is a topic that has surfaced on many occasions in my pull of work. One such i nstance was during a contract with CBC TV to work on the development of a six-part national series highborn Beautiful, ill-scented Money and the Search for Soul. The title itself speaks to the ambivalent nature of our responses to specie and its presence in our lives. As part of the contract, I appeargond as a guest on the panel, where I was asked to complete the following sentence Money is Yes, what is currency? My response was Money is a tool for wel lessening out who we really are. What you do with cash, and how you live with fundss presence in your life, tells a lot close your time value. Or, as Ralph Waldo Emerson enthrones it A dollar is non value, hardly representative of value, and, at last, of moral values. This is apparently pretty fill to what Buddhists believe astir(predicate) bullion. There are times when many of us are faced with an im repose between notes and morality and find ourselves asking in some form or a nonher How we gouge put Money and Morali ty in the same sentence and not end up with an ethical contradiction? The incompatibility of these Mwords is an inherent, yet labyrinthian part of being valet de chambre. And it is only when we face the truth of their incompatibility that we rear end come to understand the utter necessity of their coexistence.The challenge stems from the concomitant that thither is some(prenominal) a ghostlike typeface and a literal military position to our situation. When we dont bring the spiritual side into dialogue with the corporeal side, problems result. This is true for individuals as well as organizations. Think about Enron what do you think their way of dealing with silver says about the moral values that guided senior management thither? Each of us could exhaust the question on our own lives. Money, in and of itself, is neutral. It has no intrinsic value, but is a mere yardstick of value, a means of measuring or comparing in the exchange of one thing for another.Money belongs to the variety of great mental inventions, known as 1 measures Measures of distance the euphony or mile span the gulf between two things or places yet are not themselves things or places. Similarly, money brings things of contrasting value together without becoming one or the other. Because money is merely a way of measuring, it is in itself, on that pointfore, not real. Thus, money is both neutral and unreal. Nevertheless, we oftentimes seem oblivious to this unreal nature of money and equate it with things that are very real, equivalent our own values.But if, as Aristotle says, all things that are exchange 2 must be somehow comparable, what are we saying about our perception of reality when we measure our sense of self-worth by our net-worth? While money is a measure of value, that value can change depending on what the mart is willing to bear. Its rather similar to the story of the emperors new clothes. As soon as we agree something no weeklong has value, our whole per ception of it changes. This change in the perception of the value of something affects human beings psychologically and emotionally. So when the value of stocks falls through the floor, people move in fear or paranoia.Conversely, when stocks rise standardized crazy, there is hysterical neurosis fuelled by hope and counter counterbalance greed. What therefore, motivates our relativeship with money? With what intention do we strive to accumulate wealthiness? Do we pull in what our kind with money says about our values? Money Obsessing For some the question of ethics and money leads down another path. In Is Lucre Really 3 that Filthy? Craig Cox, executive editor of Utne magazine, reflects on his own journey from disdain for the master dollar as a child of the 60s to becoming of all things bourgeios, earning money and learning to manage it.There was the example by a leading voice of the counter-culture of the day, Allen Ginsberg, who wrote in Howl of burning all his money i n a wastebasket. Times take over changed even for Ginsberg, 1. David Appelbaum, Money and the City, Parabola, Volume XVI, nary(prenominal) 1 (Spring 1991), 40. 2. Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics 1133a 18. 3. Craig Cox, Is Lucre Really That Filthy, Utne Reader (July-August, 2003), 63. who of course, sold his text file to Stanford University for 4 nearly a million bucks. The irony, take downs out Cox, is that social justice activists who want to eschew wealth in order to bring about social justice and ease the poor are in fact helping people to attain the very thing they, the activists, abhor a comfortable life. He sets up an interesting dilemma when he verifys that If you insist on embracing poverty in your own life, how do you plow a credible advocate for folks who would do almost anything to 5 escape it? True enough, there are those who become enslaved to money in their attachment to mere accumulation of more and more capital.However, there are as well as those who are ens laved to money in their ascetic avoidance of it. twain are obsessive behaviours obsessed with having money or obsessed with avoiding it homogeneous the alcoholics family that is obsessed with avoiding alcohol. In neither case is money at the service of the individual as a means of providing for the necessities of life rather, the individual is at the service of money. Our emotional responses to this neutral thing called money often lead to an automatic attachment of value-statements.We grab on to labels such as evil, bewitching, aweinspiring, or filthy lucre. Respect for money is replaced with either revere or condemnation of it. Emotional and value-laden responses are also evident when conference turns towards money and self-righteous posturing rises very quickly to the surface with comments like Well, I dont soil my hands with money. Or I certainly dont 4. Ibid 5. Ibid work for money. A lot of assessment of others happens Hes just in it for the money. Or Shed do anything for money. This beliefal posturing also leads to ideological positioning.Anyone who focuses on making money is immediately dubbed a capitalist and conversely, anyone who speaks of communal sharing is dubbed a socialist. Subtleties are lost and conversation ends right there. No dialogue is possible. We move from screw of money to love of ideology, where anyone who thinks differently than I do about money is immediately evil. Spiritual Moments of Mundane Existence To judge from one side or the other is to forget that we inherently have one al-Qaeda in heaven and one foot in the mud of the world below. The challenge is to live in both simultaneously.Living as a human being means learning to deal with money whether one has a lot or a little matters not. It will do us no good to merely pursue a spiritual life unless we are living equally and simultaneously in the hearty world. Christians are exhorted to remember that even Bishops, or spiritual leaders, are told to balance both. Fo r if someone does not know how to manage his own household, how can he take care of Gods church? (1 Timothy 35) A life of wholeness, or one in which the spiritual and the stuff and nonsense are in balance, guarantees freedom from distortion.Yet the need for wholeness is also at the heart of the contradiction. The spiritual and the material are of entirely different natures. Not only must they live in the same world, both the spiritual and the human sides of our existence must also have 2 their own identity and remain in full relationship with for each one other. We have to work at accepting this incompatibility for what it is. These are separate parts of who we are and of our daily existence. These separate parts are in a dynamic relationship one to the other, like notes in a beautiful song you might have harmony, but you still have separate notes.If they are all the same note, there is not harmony, there is unison. Harmony has tension. It is beautiful because of the tension. U nison is nice, but harmony is richer. Morality And channel Just as it will not help us on an individual level to focus only on the one side of our nature at the expense of the other, likewise it will not help to divide our culture into the spirit-lead and others. It reminds me of a story I recently perceive Two men met for the first time, in of all places, a church on a Sunday morning. The one asked the other So what do you do? To which the second responded I work as a conductor of XYZ division of a business. Youre in business? quipped the first, who was a teacher, Oh thats too bad. The work of the businessman was seen as inherently less worthy. How further could the conversation go after that? It is a difficult chasm. One finds a classic case of a religious-affiliated venture that refused to acknowledge that it must wear itself like a business. After decades of mismanagement, the publishing house cried out to its constituency to get it out of a multi-million debt.One former board member was even quoted in a church publication as saying that this was seen as a church venture, not a business venture. The mistake lay in this eitheror posture. There was no acknowledgment that gifts and talents and skills of different sorts were needed. The disdain goes the other way too. One has only to think of the now infamous corporations like Enron or Livenet, where the situation is merely the reverse a business endeavor that lacks spiritual sense, and results in moral bankruptcy.If our moral principles give us the material within which we operate and the ability to continue operating depends upon financial viability, then integrity is automatically lost for any organization when either half(a) of the morality and money equation is lost. Balancing the Equation Only when we devote attention and only when we come to recognize the true place and role we have endureed money in our lives, only then can we mayhap hope to reach a deeper understanding of how important a balance between the material and the spiritual is.This deeper understanding may only come in flashes, only fleetingly. Yet the truth that is understood in an vociferous opens us up to the truth of our everyday actions and existence. In other words, we must become conscious, we must become aware of our human condition this life lived in a dynamic balance between the spiritual and the material and be attentive to both. But instead of giving the right add of attention to those mundane and material aspects of life like taxes and monetary demands put upon us, we often get caught in a bias against money.We would rather point fingers and condemn in broad strokes than engage in dialogue of particular money matters. We would rather alienate than seek to understand. Instead of casting judgment or pretending we, personally, are above being affected by money, we need to face our human situation and recognize we live in two worlds simultaneously. Maybe then we would do a better phone line o f living in both. If great truth does not enter into our relation to money, it cannot 6 enter our lives. And if we do not allow ourselves to face that truth, the shun aspects of our relationship to money will sneak up on us unawares.Bad debts, overdue bills, or an empty fridge will utterly demand so much of our human attention that we will have no energy left to focus on matters of the spirit. Undeniably, it can be a challenge to live out our moral principles in the marketplace it is inherent in the challenge of being spiritual and human at the same time. Not giving enough attention to either the spiritual or the material, on an individual or an organizational level, leads to bankruptcy, whether moral or financial. In his keep back, Business and the Buddha, Dr. Lloyd Field states, greed is a choice. We can take on to allow our insatiable desires to form our intentions or we can choose to recognize where our intentions are ultimately leading us. It is not money or wealth or even the capitalist system that is the problem, he argues. Buddhists regard wealth as neither bad nor negative. Rather, the problem sits plainly with us, human beings, and the intentions which we allow to motivate our thoughts, our emotions and our actions. It cannot be stated any clearer than said in this book we are exhorted to continually make the connection between money and human values. And then the question that really gets to the heart of the matter What price do we put on our ethics? We will need to move last(prenominal) our biases and disdain for those whom we consider to be on the other side of the money and morality equation and allow moments of eternal truth and even seemliness to infiltrate our discussions and our questions. When all gifts and skills are welcome and when integrity is our priority, then there will be the possibility of a true and dynamic relationship between money matters and morality. 6. Needleman, 265.