Privacy Concerns Essay -- Technology, DNA Databases

Privacy Concerns closely studies have shown that popular opinion holds that without a doubt case deoxyribonucleic acid databases have proved useful in criminal investigations (Wallace, 2006, pS27). The concept of a national DNA database has raised concern about cover and forgiving rights as seen through the scope of public safety. All of these concerns are upgrade with databases include convicted, arrestee, innocent, and rehabilitated offenders (Suter, 2010, p339). Robin Williams of University of Duham (2006) asserts that The rapid implementation and continuing expansion of rhetorical DNA databases around the world has been supported by claims about their effectivity in criminal investigations and challenged by assertions of the resulting intrusiveness into individual privacy (p545).To take root the balance between privacy and public safety order moldiness address many questions including (but not limited to) when is a try mandatory to be keeped and by whom, is consent req uired, is force ever delightful to obtain a sample, and which samples should be retained? Dr Katina Michael has reported that some instances that constitute acceptable DNA sample collection and storage (Table 4). The United States, England and Wales contain faithfulnessmaking that authorizes the collection of DNA from individuals arrested for violations of certain federal criminal laws and inclusion into the national DNA database of all profiles. Primary concerns emphasis these legal authorizations address privacy of a person and legal search and seizures of biological samples. For many countries standardized the United States there is a need to enact special legislation which led to delays in the implementation of DNA databases (Goodwin, et al., 2007, p102). In the United Sta... ...data from law enforcement databases for those who receive absolutions or whose convictions are overturned there is no refer to physical DNA samples (Lwin, 2010, p21). Historically, legislative pr oposals purpose indefinite retention of evidentiary DNA samples, however the US, unlike England and Wales, does not refer to retention periods for ancestral information post sentence completion. Individuals may find concern for individual(prenominal) genetic identifiers if the physical sample is retained post sentence completion, acquittal or if found innocent (Congressional Research Service, 2010, pp13-14 Beiber, 2002, p14). Studies assert the method of sample collection, accreditation of agencies collecting samples, legislative limits on retention periods for biometric information and a focus on balancing privacy and crime deterrence will structure a successful DNA database model.